VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 01/04/2020

RAJA @ AYYAPPAN versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU

[2020] 4 S.C.R. 1112 · 2020 INSC 325

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant after excluding his purported confession and those of two separately tried co-accused. The recording proceedings did not substantiate statutory warnings or voluntary confession; a certificate alone could not cure those defects. Under the amended TADA provision, a co-accused’s confession required joint trial. The appellant’s earlier abscondence did not permit dispensing with that statutory condition.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant’s police-recorded confession was voluntary and usable under TADA safeguards.
  2. Whether confessions of separately tried co-accused could be used because the appellant had absconded.

Held

Result

Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside and appellant acquitted. As he was already on bail, no release direction was necessary; his bail bond and any surety bond stood cancelled.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2020] 4 S.C.R. 1112.