Summary
The Court allowed a limited clarification application and corrected its earlier judgment by replacing “unsecured creditor” with “secured creditor” in paragraph 20.
Issues
- Whether the earlier judgment required clarification of the creditor’s status.
Held
- The reference to “unsecured creditor” in paragraph 20 of the earlier judgment was to be read as “secured creditor”; the judgment was corrected to that extent only. (¶¶ 4, 5)
Result
The clarification application was disposed of after the limited correction; delay was condoned.