VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 26/08/2019

SAMSUL HAQUE versus THE STATE OF ASSAM

[2019] 11 S.C.R. 229 · 2019 INSC 953

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Court reversed the High Court’s convictions of three men whose trial-court acquittals it had overturned. Against Samsul Haque, the independent evidence did not establish presence or instigation, and his examination under section 313 was perfunctory. Against the other two appellants, the alleged shooting was unsupported by medical or physical evidence and witness accounts varied. The trial court’s view was at least plausible, precluding reversal of acquittal on this record.

Issues

  1. Whether the evidence justified reversing the trial court’s acquittals of the three appellants.
  2. Effect of failing to put material incriminating evidence to an accused during section 313 examination.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeals allowed; Samsul Haque acquitted and bail bonds discharged. Abdul Rashid and Imdadul Islam acquitted on benefit of doubt and ordered released forthwith. Parties to bear their own costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 11 S.C.R. 229.