VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 02/12/2022

STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS versus LINDE INDIA LIMITED AND ANOTHER

[2022] 17 S.C.R. 858 · 2022 INSC 1240

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

Linde India supplied pure oxygen to Tata Steel for basic oxygen steelmaking and claimed the 2% concessional sales tax rate for raw materials under Section 13(1)(b) of the Bihar Finance Act. On remand, a six-member expert committee found that the oxygen acts only as a refining agent that reduces carbon content, not as a direct raw material. The assessing, appellate and revisional authorities levied 3%, but the Jharkhand High Court held oxygen to be a raw material. The Supreme Court restored the 3% assessment. A writ court does not sit in appeal over concurrent findings of fact, particularly technical findings resting on an expert report. On merits, applying Thomas Stephen, which Ballarpur Industries had not overruled, oxygen used as a refining agent is not a raw material in the manufacture of steel.

Issues

  1. Whether oxygen used to refine pig iron into steel by the basic oxygen process is a 'raw material' attracting the 2% concessional rate under Section 13(1)(b) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981.
  2. Whether the High Court could upset concurrent findings based on an expert committee report under Article 226.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Civil Appeal Nos. 8061-8064 of 2022 allowed; the Jharkhand High Court judgment dated 03.08.2015 in W.P. (T) Nos. 1929, 1939, 1940 and 1941 of 2015 set aside and the assessment order, as confirmed up to the revisional authority, restored; no costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2022] 17 S.C.R. 858.