VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 09/12/2019

M/S. THE BOMBAY DYEING AND MFG. CO. LTDNER OF CENTRAL EXCISE versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

[2019] 17 S.C.R. 1057 · 2019 INSC 1338

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Court upheld recovery of differential excise duty following finalisation of provisional assessments. The assessee had voluntarily furnished B-13 bonds and bank guarantees and filed returns endorsed as provisional while challenging duty on captive consumption. It could not subsequently insist on a separate provisional-assessment order or a notice under Section 11A. The Delhi High Court’s disposal order did not release the bonds or require a notice where the governing procedure did not require one.

Issues

  1. Whether the assessments were provisional despite the absence of a separate express order.
  2. Whether recovery required a Section 11A notice or violated the Delhi High Court’s disposal directions.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, disposed of.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 17 S.C.R. 1057.