VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 01/02/2018

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE SERVICE TAX versus ULTRA TECH CEMENT LTD.

[2018] 6 S.C.R. 651 · 2018 INSC 87

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court disallowed CENVAT credit for transport from the place of removal to buyers’ premises for the January–June 2010 period. The amended input-service definition restricted clearance-related credit to services used “up to” the place of removal, replacing the earlier wording “from”. The 2007 Board circular could not extend credit contrary to the amended rule. Revenue’s appeal was allowed and the original assessment order, including its recovery directions, was restored.

Issues

  1. Whether the amended input-service definition allowed credit for outward transport beyond the place of removal in 2010.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Revenue appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside and Order-in-Original dated 22 August 2011 restored. Outward-transport credit in issue disallowed.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2018] 6 S.C.R. 651.