VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 03/03/2020

RAMESH SINGH versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.

[2020] 2 S.C.R. 1117 · 2020 INSC 254

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court upheld a fresh disciplinary enquiry from the charge-sheet stage into allegedly irregular teacher appointments and continued the officer’s suspension during that enquiry. Selection Committee recommendations were required under the appointment rules, but the officer’s reliance on court orders and senior officials’ directions remained for investigation. The enquiry had to afford full evidentiary opportunity and finish within four months. The Chief Secretary was directed to appoint the enquiry officer, modifying the High Court’s direction.

Issues

  1. Whether a fresh enquiry and continued suspension were justified after the earlier enquiry violated natural justice.
  2. Who should appoint the enquiry officer and what safeguards should govern the renewed enquiry.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Civil appeal dismissed with modification: fresh enquiry upheld, suspension continued, four-month completion directed and Chief Secretary to appoint the enquiry officer. Copy to be sent to the Chief Secretary; pending applications disposed of. Merits left open.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2020] 2 S.C.R. 1117.