VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 01/03/2023

M/S DHARTI DREDGING AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, GUNTUR

[2023] 4 S.C.R. 739 · 2023 INSC 184

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

An importer of a cutter suction dredger with pipes, boats, pumping units, engines and spares classified the consignment under heading 8905 10 00 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and claimed nil duty under Notification 21/2002-Cus; the Commissioner (Appeals), following Boskalis Dredging, held nine ancillary items exempt as integral to the dredger, but the CESTAT reversed, relying on Note 2(e) to Section XVII. The Supreme Court restored the appellate order: a non-propelled cutter suction dredger cannot function without booster pumps, compressors and discharge pipelines, so these items are integral parts and not separate articles, the test being essentiality for dredging rather than possible independent use; Steel Authority of India on guide cars for coke ovens is distinguishable; the concurrent exclusion of generators was left undisturbed.

Issues

  1. Whether pumping units, air compressors, pipes, wire mesh, steel angle plates and boats imported with a cutter suction dredger are integral parts of the dredger entitled to exemption under heading 8905 and Notification 21/2002-Cus, or separate articles excluded by Note 2(e) to Section XVII of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal allowed in part without costs; CESTAT, Bangalore order dated 28.05.2009 in Appeal No. C/690/2008 set aside and the order of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Guntur dated 30.06.2008 granting exemption to nine items restored, generators remaining excluded; pending applications disposed of.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2023] 4 S.C.R. 739.