VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 15/02/2019

GAURAV KUMAR @ MONU versus THE STATE OF HARYANA

[2019] 3 S.C.R. 372 · 2019 INSC 208

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Court remitted the appellant’s juvenility claim for fresh High Court consideration despite withdrawal of his additional-evidence applications. The 2003 age inquiry had to be assessed under the 2001 Rules, rather than the hierarchy introduced by the 2007 Rules. The High Court was directed to receive the additional documents and consider all relevant material and the Sessions Judge’s report before deciding the criminal appeal on merits. The Court itself did not determine juvenility.

Issues

  1. Which rules governed assessment of the earlier age inquiry.
  2. Whether the High Court should reconsider juvenility with the additional documents despite withdrawal of the applications.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeals disposed of; High Court order set aside and juvenility question remitted for fresh consideration with the additional documents. No final finding of juvenility or alteration of conviction made by the Supreme Court.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 3 S.C.R. 372.