Summary
On a miscellaneous application in the Vijay Kurle contempt matter, the Court directed the corrigendum identified in the office report to be carried out in its judgment dated 27 April 2020. The table specified that the erroneous reference “92) of Article 142” in the continuation of paragraph 7 on page 8 should read “(2) of Article 142”. The application was allowed.
Issues
- Whether the specified typographical correction should be incorporated in the earlier judgment.
Held
- The Court directed incorporation of the suggested corrigendum: in paragraph 7 continuing on page 8, fifth line from the bottom, “92) of Article 142” was to be read as “(2) of Article 142”. (¶ Unnumbered order and corrigendum table)
Result
Miscellaneous Application No.486 of 2022 allowed. The specified corrigendum was directed to be carried out in the judgment dated 27 April 2020.