VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 27/10/2021

XLO INDIA LIMITED AND ANOTHER versus INTERNATIONAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS

[2021] 6 S.C.R. 1096 · 2021 INSC 924

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

On the parties’ broad consensus, the Court arranged a further Rs.5 crore deposit and permitted specified withdrawals while the DRT decided the disputed debt-discharge appeal. The share attachment continued, but further recovery proceedings were stayed pending the DRT’s time-bound decision. Withdrawals remained subject to the appeal’s outcome, with refund of any excess if ordered in the appellant’s favour. The Court left legal questions open and did not decide whether the debt had been discharged.

Issues

  1. What interim deposit, withdrawal and recovery arrangements should govern the pending appeal concerning alleged discharge of the debt.

Held

Result

Appeal disposed of on the recorded deposit, withdrawal, repayment and interim-protection terms. DRT directed to decide Appeal No.1/2020 within eight weeks; further recovery stayed meanwhile and share attachment continued. Related pre-deposit appeal and pending applications disposed of; legal questions kept open.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1096.