VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 27/08/2019

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITYOF versus SAYEDABAD TEA COMPANY LTD. AND ORS.

[2019] 11 S.C.R. 725 · 2019 INSC 957

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Court held that section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act could not be used to appoint an arbitrator for a national-highway compensation dispute because section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act vested that power exclusively in the Central Government. Delay did not transfer the appointment power to the High Court. Setting aside the appointment and review orders, the Court directed a Central Government appointment within 30 days and expedited adjudication.

Issues

  1. Whether section 11 appointment jurisdiction applied to compensation arbitration under section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act.
  2. Whether delay in appointment forfeited the Central Government’s power and what remedy was available.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeals allowed without costs; High Court appointment and review orders set aside. Central Government to appoint under section 3G(5) within 30 days without a fresh application; adjudication within six months after the applicant enters appearance. Compensation quantum not decided.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 11 S.C.R. 725.