VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 20/10/2023

MANMOHAN GOPAL versus THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR.

[2023] 14 S.C.R. 1073 · 2023 INSC 953

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

Exercising Article 142 powers after persistent obstruction of maintenance recovery, the Supreme Court directed sale of six attached shops through the Delhi High Court Registrar and continued attachment of gym-premises rent. If the outstanding balance was not paid within one year, the applicant could opt for transfer of the gym premises or its auction under the specified timetable. A decree was directed. The relief rested on the exceptional history and earlier orders, rather than a general rule making every father-in-law liable for maintenance.

Issues

  1. What effective relief could secure maintenance after repeated noncompliance and unsuccessful recovery attempts.
  2. Whether complete-justice powers justified sale and conditional conveyance of the attached premises on this record.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Applications disposed of with Article 142 directions for sale of six shops, continued rent attachment, conditional conveyance or auction of the gym premises, payment of realizations and preparation of a decree recording the amount due.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2023] 14 S.C.R. 1073.