VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 18/04/2022

STATE BANK OF INDIA versus KRISHIDHAN SEEDS PRIVATE LIMITED

[2022] 2 S.C.R. 1155 · 2022 INSC 428

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

SBI’s insolvency application had been rejected as time-barred on the premise that acknowledgement could not extend limitation after the recorded default. Applying subsequent binding decisions, the Court held Section 18 of the Limitation Act applicable and recognised that qualifying balance-sheet acknowledgements could renew limitation. It did not decide whether SBI’s particular documents established timeliness. The orders were set aside and the application restored for fresh NCLT adjudication within three months, with factual contentions open.

Issues

  1. Whether Section 18 acknowledgements could extend limitation for the Section 7 insolvency application.
  2. Whether the application’s factual timeliness should be determined on remand.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal allowed. The NCLT and NCLAT orders were set aside and the Section 7 application restored to the NCLT, with factual rights and contentions open. Disposal was directed within three months of the order. Pending applications disposed of.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2022] 2 S.C.R. 1155.