VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 17/12/2020

REGISTRAR KARNATAKA UNIVERSITY & ANR.V. DR. PRABHUGOUDA & ANR. versus DR. PRABHUGOUDA & ANR

[2020] 9 S.C.R. 859 · 2020 INSC 709

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Court rejected a teacher’s claim to backdate his Career Advancement Scheme promotion to a period when he worked in an affiliated college before joining Karnataka University. Under the University’s governing statute, past service could count towards promotion eligibility, but the effective promotion date could not precede entry into University service. Reading the scheme with its preamble, colleges meant constituent colleges, and the wider definition in the parent Act did not enlarge the scheme.

Issues

  1. Whether counting service in an affiliated college permitted University CAS promotion to take effect before joining University service.
  2. Whether the parent Act’s wider definition of college governed the scope of the University’s CAS statute.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

University appeal allowed; High Court appellate judgment set aside and teacher’s writ petition dismissed. No order as to costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2020] 9 S.C.R. 859.