VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 25/04/2019

SUMAN JINDAL & ANR. versus M/S ADARSH DEVELOPERS

[2019] 7 S.C.R. 154 · 2019 INSC 572

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The developer’s cancellation was unjustified because accepted email correspondence reduced the booking requirement from 25% to 15%, which the buyers had exceeded. Their request for a sale agreement to obtain sanctioned loan disbursal accorded with the developer’s statutory duty. A later agreement to sell to a third party could not defeat their prior contractual rights. Completion, registration and possession were directed against payment of the prescribed balance, interest and charges.

Issues

  1. Whether the booking-payment requirement had been varied and satisfied.
  2. Whether seeking documentation for loan disbursal constituted buyer default.
  3. Whether the later third-party agreement defeated the buyers’ claim to completion.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal allowed without costs. Completion of sale, registration and possession directed on the prescribed payment and charges; buyers to pay within four weeks. SCDRC Registrar authorised to execute documents on developer default. Interim status quo to continue until completion.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 7 S.C.R. 154.