VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 18/02/2021

TATA MOTORS LTD. versus ANTONIO PAULO VAZ AND ANR.

[2021] 1 S.C.R. 625 · 2021 INSC 103

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court set aside consumer findings against a car manufacturer where a dealer had sold an older, used vehicle as new, but the complaint neither pleaded nor proved the manufacturer’s involvement or knowledge. The relationship on the facts was principal to principal; liability could not be inferred merely from the manufacturer’s defence or general supervision of dealerships. The consumer retained the right to execute the refund-and-interest relief against the dealer, while the manufacturer’s deposits were ordered returned with accrued interest.

Issues

  1. Whether the manufacturer could be held liable for the dealer’s misrepresentation without pleading and proof of its involvement or knowledge.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal allowed; findings against the manufacturer set aside and its deposits with accrued interest to be refunded. Consumer’s alternative refund-and-interest remedy against the dealer preserved; no costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2021] 1 S.C.R. 625.