VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 19/09/2022

MRS. ETHEL LOURDES D’SOUZA LOBO versus LUCIO NEVILLE JUDE DE SOUZA & ORS.

[2022] 18 S.C.R. 115 · 2022 INSC 977

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

In Goa inventory proceedings under the Portuguese Civil Procedure Code to partition the estate of a deceased couple, Hermano, an heir and the Cabeça de Casal, was the highest bidder for one property at a 2005 licitation, a closed auction among heirs. He died in 2008 without depositing anything. No chart of partition had yet been drawn and no demand for owelty had been made. The appellant sought a fresh licitation. The inventory court ordered re-auction, but the District Judge and the High Court held that Hermano's rights as successful bidder passed to his heirs. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals. Under Article 1417(c), the obligation to deposit owelty arises only on a demand after the chart of partition is prepared, and none had been made. Under Article 1737, a successful bidder's position is not a merely personal right and is inherited.

Issues

  1. Whether a licitation is rendered ineffective when the successful bidder dies without depositing the bid amount before any chart of partition or demand for owelty under Article 1417(c)
  2. Whether a successful bidder's rights and obligations in a licitation devolve on his heirs under Article 1737 or are merely personal rights extinguished by death

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeals dismissed. The High Court's judgment, holding that Hermano's rights as successful bidder devolved on his heirs and refusing re-auction, was upheld; no order as to costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2022] 18 S.C.R. 115.