VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 27/10/2020

SATYAMA DUBEY & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

[2020] 9 S.C.R. 517 · 2020 INSC 612

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

In petitions concerning the Hathras incident, the Court left monitoring of the ongoing CBI investigation to the Allahabad High Court, which was already seized of suo motu proceedings. It directed CRPF protection for the victim’s family and witnesses within a week as a confidence-building measure. The merits, the alleged illegal cremation and any future transfer of trial remained open. Identifying family details were to be removed from the High Court’s records.

Issues

  1. Whether the Supreme Court should itself monitor the CBI investigation or leave supervision to the High Court.
  2. What protection and related procedural directions were required for the victim’s family and witnesses.

Held

Result

Writ petitions and applications disposed of without costs, with High Court monitoring and CRPF protection directions. Merits and future trial-transfer question left open.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2020] 9 S.C.R. 517.