VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 07/03/2019

K. ANANDA RAO ETC. versus SRI S.S. RAWAT, IAS AND ORS. ETC.

[2019] 5 S.C.R. 287 · 2019 INSC 331

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions seeking back wages for the gap between retirement at 58 and reinstatement following enhancement of retirement age to 60. Its earlier direction granting consequential benefits did not override the governing policy limits or award salary for periods not worked. Eligible employees retained the benefits actually conferred by those policies.

Issues

  1. Whether the earlier grant of consequential benefits required full salary for the intervening period not worked.
  2. Whether failure to pay such salary breached the Court’s order.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Contempt petitions dismissed. Policy-conferred benefits preserved for similarly situated employees; claim to salary and other emoluments for the period not actually worked rejected.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 5 S.C.R. 287.