VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 12/04/2023

JOLLY GEORGE AND ANR. versus GEORGE ELIAS AND ASSOCIATES AND ORS.

[2023] 3 S.C.R. 413 · 2023 INSC 365

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

A road contractor holding an Acknowledgement Certificate under the Kerala Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Act, 2019 and consent from the State Pollution Control Board was refused a Gram Panchayat licence for a hot mix plant; the Kerala High Court directed the Panchayat to grant permission subject to conditions but refused a declaration that no Panchayat licence was needed. The Supreme Court allowed the contractor's appeal and dismissed the objectors' appeals: under Section 6 the certificate has effect as every approval required under State law for three years, Section 10 gives the Act overriding effect specifically over the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, rules or a self-certification form cannot annul the statute, and no reading down was warranted since the Act does not override pollution control laws and Pollution Control Board consent had been obtained.

Issues

  1. Whether an enterprise holding an Acknowledgement Certificate under Section 5 of the Kerala Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Act, 2019 requires a separate licence or permission from the Gram Panchayat under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and the Panchayat Building Rules, 2019.
  2. Whether the overriding clause in Section 10 of the 2019 Act should be read down in the interest of environmental protection and Panchayat participation.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal of the writ petitioner George Elias and Associates allowed, the High Court orders set aside and both writ petitions allowed, including the declaration that no separate Panchayat licence is required in view of the Acknowledgement Certificate; appeals of the objectors dismissed; no order as to costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2023] 3 S.C.R. 413.