VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 08/08/2019

ZONAL MANAGER, BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, KOCHI & ORS. versus AARYA K. BABU & ANR.

[2019] 11 S.C.R. 627 · 2019 INSC 882

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The later inclusion of B.Sc. Forestry could not retrospectively validate appointments under an advertisement prescribing different qualifications. Courts could not confer equivalence selectively and disadvantage eligible persons who had not applied. The banks’ appeals succeeded, but Aarya K. Babu received a case-specific Article 142 direction for fresh appointment against an existing or future vacancy, without prior-service benefits. Previously retained officers in similar recruitments were protected from action based on this judgment.

Issues

  1. Whether a later qualification change or judicially assumed equivalence could validate the completed recruitment.
  2. What exceptional relief and protection were appropriate.

Held

Result

Both bank appeals allowed without costs; High Court orders set aside. Bank of India to give Aarya K. Babu fresh appointment against an existing or future vacancy without past benefits. Existing similarly accepted officers protected from action based on this ruling.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 11 S.C.R. 627.