VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 05/08/2022

RUCHI RAWAT versus PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT ETAH & ANR.

[2022] 6 S.C.R. 1148 · 2022 INSC 1314

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

A wife living with her parents in Mathura, without income of her own, sought transfer of her husband's divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act from the Family Court at Etah to the Family Court at Mathura. She cited the difficulty of travelling, her dependence on her parents and an alleged threat on her way back from a hearing. The Allahabad High Court rejected her transfer application. Following N.C.V. Aishwarya, the Court reiterated that the ends of justice govern transfer under Section 24 CPC. Courts must weigh the parties' economic position, social circumstances and means of sustenance, and in matrimonial matters it is generally the wife's convenience that must be considered. On the facts, transfer to Mathura was just and proper. The appeal was allowed and the divorce suit transferred.

Issues

  1. Whether a husband's divorce petition pending at Etah should be transferred to Mathura, where the wife lives with her parents without independent income.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal allowed. The High Court's order is set aside and the divorce suit is transferred from the Family Court, Etah to the Family Court, Mathura; parties to bear their own costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2022] 6 S.C.R. 1148.