VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 29/11/2022

SUNEETHA NARREDDY & ANOTHER versus THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND OTHERS

[2022] 8 S.C.R. 745 · 2022 INSC 1238

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The daughter and widow of Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy, murdered at his Andhra Pradesh home in March 2019, sought transfer of the CBI case from the Special Court, Kadapa. The Supreme Court found their fear of an unfair trial and investigation reasonable, not imaginary. The CBI's further investigation into the larger conspiracy had stalled after an FIR was lodged against its officers. Two key witnesses needed police protection, one witness stopped coming forward once reinstated, and another died in mysterious circumstances after first volunteering a Section 164 statement. Victims are entitled to a fair trial, which is part of Article 21. Given the 250-odd witnesses, the Court sent the trial to the CBI Special Court, Hyderabad rather than Delhi, and directed the CBI to finish the further investigation promptly and independently.

Issues

  1. Whether the victims' apprehension that the murder trial and further investigation could not be fair in Andhra Pradesh was reasonable enough to warrant transfer of the trial outside the State.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 169 of 2022 allowed; the trial in RC-04(S)/2020/CBI/SC-III/New Delhi transferred from the CBI Special Court, Kadapa to the CBI Special Court, Hyderabad with all papers, and the CBI directed to complete the further investigation into the larger conspiracy and destruction of evidence at the earliest, independently and without bias.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2022] 8 S.C.R. 745.