VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 02/03/2023

VISHAL TIWARI versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS

[2023] 2 S.C.R. 951 · 2023 INSC 191

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

Writ petitions under Article 32 following the steep fall in Adani Group share prices after the Hindenburg Research report of January 2023 sought a court-monitored investigation, prosecution of the short seller, and protection of public institutions exposed to the group. Noting SEBI's statement that it was already enquiring, the Supreme Court directed SEBI to include in its investigation whether Rule 19A of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957 on minimum public shareholding was violated, whether related-party transactions went undisclosed, and whether stock prices were manipulated, and to report within two months. To protect investors from such volatility the Court constituted an expert committee headed by Justice A.M. Sapre to assess the regulatory framework, examine possible regulatory failure and suggest strengthening measures.

Issues

  1. What directions are warranted on petitions under Article 32 seeking investigation into allegations against a listed corporate group and protection of investors after sharp market volatility, when the securities regulator is already enquiring into the matter.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Notice issued and directions given: SEBI to investigate the specified aspects and file a status report within two months; expert committee headed by Justice A.M. Sapre constituted with the stated remit, to furnish its report in sealed cover within two months.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2023] 2 S.C.R. 951.