VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 24/04/2018

RAMSINGBHAI (RAMSANGBHAI) JERAMBHAI versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.

[2018] 3 S.C.R. 1019 · 2018 INSC 405

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court held that section 28A redetermination depends on the Reference Court’s award under Part III of the Land Acquisition Act, not a fresh three-month period from an appellate judgment under section 54. An appellate court is outside the provision’s defined reference to the original civil court. For a qualifying redetermination proceeding, however, the Collector should await pending higher-court decisions and apply the final modified compensation. The appellant’s claim founded on the High Court judgment was rejected.

Issues

  1. Whether the three-month application period under section 28A could run from a section 54 appellate judgment.
  2. How pending appeals affect determination of compensation on a qualifying section 28A application.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal dismissed without costs; pending applications disposed of. No fresh section 28A entitlement or limitation period arose from the High Court’s section 54 judgment.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1019.