VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 22/02/2024

RAVINDRA KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P. & ORS.

[2024] 2 S.C.R. 722 · 2024 INSC 131

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

Non-disclosure of an acquitted criminal case in a police recruitment verification form is not automatically fatal. Suitability must be assessed objectively and individually, considering the post, the case and acquittal, the questions asked, other antecedents, verification reports and the fairness of the cancellation decision. On these facts, cancelling the selected candidate’s appointment was arbitrary.

Issues

  1. Whether omission of a criminal case that arose after the application and ended in acquittal automatically justified cancelling the appellant’s selection as a constable.
  2. Whether the appointing authority assessed the appellant’s suitability objectively and fairly in light of the verification reports and the circumstances of the acquittal.

Held

Result

Appeal allowed; the cancellation and High Court orders were set aside. The respondents were directed to appoint the appellant as a constable within four weeks, with notional pay, seniority and consequential benefits but no salary arrears for the period he did not serve. No order as to costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2024] 2 S.C.R. 722.