VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 21/01/2020

KEISHAM MEGHACHANDRA SINGH versus THE HON’BLE SPEAKER MANIPUR LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY & ORS.

[2020] 2 S.C.R. 132 · 2020 INSC 65

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court held that judicial review may require a Speaker to decide pending disqualification petitions promptly. The bar on premature interference does not shield failure to exercise jurisdiction. Ordinarily, absent exceptional circumstances supported by good reason, such petitions should be decided within three months of filing. In this case the Speaker was directed to decide within four weeks of intimation. The Court declined itself to disqualify the member or issue quo warranto against his ministerial appointment.

Issues

  1. Whether judicial review could compel a timely Speaker’s decision and whether the Court should itself determine disqualification or remove the minister in these appeals.

Held

Result

High Court judgment set aside. Appeals arising from SLP(C) Nos.18659 and 18763 of 2019 partly allowed; those from SLP(C) Nos.23703 and 24146 of 2019 dismissed in the stated terms. Speaker directed to decide pending disqualification petitions within four weeks of intimation, with liberty to seek further directions if no decision follows. No costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2020] 2 S.C.R. 132.