VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 20/07/2018

HETCHIN HAOKIP versus STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS.

[2018] 6 S.C.R. 597 · 2018 INSC 628

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court set aside preventive detention because the District Magistrate failed to explain a five-day delay in reporting it to the State Government. Section 3(4) of the National Security Act requires reporting at the earliest possible time without avoidable delay. The twelve-day approval period does not grant an equivalent reporting window, and an explanation about serving grounds on the detenu did not answer the distinct reporting lapse.

Issues

  1. What forthwith reporting under Section 3(4) required and whether the unexplained five-day delay vitiated detention.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal allowed. High Court judgment dismissing the writ petition and the consequential detention order set aside.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2018] 6 S.C.R. 597.