VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 06/08/2025

IN RE: T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

[2025] 8 S.C.R. 1003 · 2025 INSC 996

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

In applications concerning the Matheran eco-sensitive zone, the Supreme Court accepted the expert reports of IIT Bombay and NEERI and permitted clay paver blocks (without a concrete bed) on the Dasturi Naka to Shivaji Maharaj Statue road only, and held that the practice of humans towing hand-pulled carts/rickshaws offends human dignity and the constitutional promise of social and economic justice reflected in Articles 23 and 38, directing the State of Maharashtra to stop it within six months and to rehabilitate the pullers through an e-rickshaw hire scheme modelled on the Kevadia scheme, with allotments identified by the Matheran Monitoring Committee.

Issues

  1. Whether paver blocks should be permitted on the main road from Dasturi Naka to Shivaji Maharaj Statue in Matheran and, if so, of what type.
  2. Whether the practice of hand-pulled carts/rickshaws in Matheran should continue, and whether e-rickshaws should be permitted on that road.
  3. How many e-rickshaws should be permitted and to whom they should be allotted, and how the hand cart/rickshaw pullers should be rehabilitated.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Applications disposed of with directions: clay paver blocks permitted on the main road without a concrete bed; hand-pulled carts/rickshaws to be stopped within six months; State of Maharashtra to evolve an e-rickshaw hire scheme on the Kevadia model, with allottees identified by the Matheran Monitoring Committee under the Collector, Raigad.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1003.