VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 15/02/2022

SATYE SINGH & ANOTHER versus STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

[2022] 1 S.C.R. 1137 · 2022 INSC 185

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

A husband and mother-in-law were convicted of murder and disappearance of evidence after the wife’s burnt body was found in a hut. Although medical evidence established homicide, the prosecution did not connect the accused to the killing through a complete chain of circumstances. Section 106 could not replace proof of the foundational facts. The Court set aside both convictions, acquitted the appellants and directed their immediate release.

Issues

  1. Whether the circumstantial evidence proved that the appellants committed the homicide and destroyed evidence.
  2. Whether Section 106 shifted the burden to the accused despite gaps in the prosecution case.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal allowed. Convictions and sentences set aside; both appellants acquitted and directed to be released forthwith.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2022] 1 S.C.R. 1137.