VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 02/03/2020

PAWAN KUMAR ARYA AND OTHERS versus RAVI KUMAR ARYA AND OTHERS

[2020] 4 S.C.R. 770 · 2020 INSC 252

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court required both Arya family groups to implement their overall consent settlement, including supplemental terms, rather than enforce only favourable portions. To balance their positions, it nevertheless directed the RA Group to countersign allotment letters for the PA Group’s eight flats within two weeks. Those flats could not be alienated pending full implementation. Both groups had four months to complete the agreed supplemental arrangement; the RA Group remained free to deal with its seven flats.

Issues

  1. Whether the PA Group could obtain unconditional execution of its flat entitlement before completing the overall family settlement.
  2. What directions would secure implementation while protecting both groups.

Held

Result

High Court orders modified and appeals disposed of: supplemental settlement and full compliance within four months; RA Group to countersign Annexure E within two weeks. PA Group restrained from alienating its eight flats until implementation; injunction continued with the specified seven-flat exception. No costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2020] 4 S.C.R. 770.