VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 03/09/2019

M/S GEO MILLER & CO. PVT. LTD. versus CHAIRMAN, RAJASTHAN VIDYUT UTPADAN NIGAM LTD.

[2019] 11 S.C.R. 1108 · 2019 INSC 989

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

A contractor sought appointment of arbitrators in 2003 for unpaid final bills dating to 1983 and 1989, relying on prolonged negotiations and later correspondence. The Court held that the 1996 Act governed because arbitration was invoked in 2002, but the claims were time-barred. Genuine settlement negotiations may affect accrual on proved facts; vague assertions and unilateral reminders did not postpone it here. Dismissal of the applications was upheld.

Issues

  1. Which Arbitration Act governed despite contractual reference to the 1940 Act.
  2. Whether correspondence and asserted negotiations postponed limitation for the claims.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

The appeals were dismissed and the High Court’s dismissal of the arbitration applications as time-barred was confirmed in the terms stated.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 11 S.C.R. 1108.