VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 15/12/2017

TEESTA ATUL SETALVAD versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT

[2017] 12 S.C.R. 774 · 2017 INSC 1239

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The appellants sought release of personal and trust bank accounts frozen during investigation of alleged donation misuse. The Court upheld freezing under section 102 because material disclosed circumstances creating suspicion connected with the investigated offences and the Magistrate had been informed. It left factual explanations and later de-freezing requests open.

Issues

  1. Whether section 102 authorised freezing these bank accounts, including an account of a trust not named as an accused, and whether prior notice was required.
  2. What remedies remained against continued freezing as investigation progressed.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeals dismissed; freezing upheld at this stage, with later or appropriate-stage de-freezing avenues preserved in the stated terms.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2017] 12 S.C.R. 774.