VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 06/02/2018

MADAN @ MADHU PATEKAR versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

[2018] 4 S.C.R. 1003 · 2018 INSC 104

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court affirmed the appellant’s murder conviction and life sentence on two consistent dying declarations identifying him as the person who poured kerosene and set the deceased alight. Medical evidence supported her fitness to make the declaration. A reliable dying declaration can sustain conviction without mandatory corroboration, but courts must scrutinize it cautiously for fitness, voluntariness and possible tutoring. No perversity justified disturbing the concurrent findings. The request concerning remission was left to the Government without judicial relief.

Issues

  1. Whether the consistent dying declarations reliably sustained the murder conviction despite the defence objections and minor discrepancies.

Held

Result

Appeal dismissed; murder conviction and life sentence affirmed. No remission relief granted; any representation remained for Government consideration.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2018] 4 S.C.R. 1003.