VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 10/04/2023

AJAY SHANKAR SRIVASTAVA versus BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR

[2023] 6 S.C.R. 505 · 2023 INSC 346

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

A practising advocate challenged under Article 32 a Bar Council of India office order of 1 November 2022 directing State Bar Councils not to proceed with verification of advocates under the Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015, and questioned the method of co-opting members to fill casual vacancies. Noting that only about 9.22 lakh of 20.57 lakh enrolled advocates had submitted verification forms or declarations, that persons with fake degrees gravely endanger the administration of justice, and the Bar Council's clarification that the order only required verification of underlying degree certificates, the Supreme Court constituted a High Powered Committee chaired by a former Judge of the Court to monitor verification of degree and enrolment certificates, directed universities to verify certificates without fee, and called for a status report.

Issues

  1. Whether the Bar Council of India's office order dated 1 November 2022 halted the verification of advocates enrolled with State Bar Councils, and what mechanism should be put in place to ensure due verification of advocates' degree and enrolment certificates.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Directions issued: High Powered Committee constituted to monitor verification of advocates' degree and enrolment certificates, with the Secretary of the Bar Council of India as nodal officer; universities and examination boards to verify certificates without fee and without undue delay; status report to be filed by 31 August 2023; the order not to be construed as extending the existing terms of the Bar Councils.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2023] 6 S.C.R. 505.