VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 17/08/2021

RAJINDER KUMAR BANSAL & ORS versus MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE & ORS.

[2021] 8 S.C.R. 225 · 2021 INSC 405

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Court restored eviction orders concerning land leased for a club and pavilion. For the Haryana rent legislation, business has a wider meaning than trade and need not involve profit. Activities serving a section of the public could therefore bring the club land within the definition of rented land. Definitions adopted under taxation or other statutes did not control this inquiry. The tenants received three months to vacate; the landlords were directed to discharge all land-tax dues before using the premises.

Issues

  1. Whether land leased for club activities without a profit motive was rented land within the Haryana rent legislation.
  2. Whether outstanding property taxes prevented the landlords from obtaining eviction.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeals allowed; eviction orders restored with three months to vacate and a direction to the landlords to pay all land-tax dues before using the premises.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2021] 8 S.C.R. 225.