VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 07/05/2019

RAFIQ QURESHI versus NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU EASTERN ZONAL UNIT

[2019] 7 S.C.R. 248 · 2019 INSC 639

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

Section 32B of the NDPS Act does not confine punishment above the statutory minimum to its six enumerated factors. Other relevant considerations, including the magnitude of the drug quantity, may justify a higher sentence, subject to appellate scrutiny for relevance. While rejecting the claim to a mandatory ten-year sentence, the Court reduced this carrier’s imprisonment from sixteen to twelve years on the overall circumstances, maintaining conviction, fine and default imprisonment.

Issues

  1. Whether a sentence above the statutory minimum required an enumerated Section 32B factor.
  2. Whether quantity was a relevant additional factor and what sentence was appropriate here.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal partly allowed on sentence. Conviction maintained; imprisonment reduced from sixteen to twelve years’ rigorous imprisonment. Fine of Rs.2 lakh and six months’ simple imprisonment in default maintained.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 7 S.C.R. 248.