VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 12/03/2018

SUDHAKAR @ SUDHARASAN versus STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRIRANGAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY, TAMIL NADU

[2018] 4 S.C.R. 612 · 2018 INSC 229

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court reversed a murder conviction because material contradictions and evidentiary weaknesses created reasonable doubt. The main witnesses had a demonstrated property dispute with the accused; independent witnesses did not support the prosecution account, and the arrest, recovery, complaint and hospital evidence contained substantial inconsistencies. Relationship alone does not discredit testimony, but the lower courts failed to scrutinise these witnesses’ evidence with the care warranted by the facts. Release was ordered unless required in another case.

Issues

  1. Whether the interested witnesses’ testimony reliably supported the conviction.
  2. Whether contradictions and weaknesses concerning presence, arrest, recovery and medical history created reasonable doubt.

Held

Result

Appeal allowed and conviction set aside; appellant to be released forthwith unless required in another case. Pending applications disposed of.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2018] 4 S.C.R. 612.