VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 22/03/2022

KIRPAL KAUR AND ANOTHER versus RITESH AND OTHERS

[2022] 1 S.C.R. 798 · 2022 INSC 323

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The vendor’s heirs challenged specific performance by characterising the sale agreement as loan security. The Court upheld the findings of execution, part-payment and readiness and willingness; stating marriage expenses as the sale’s purpose did not change the agreement’s character. It dismissed the appeal but, under Article 142, required the purchasers to pay an additional Rs.3,50,000, besides the Rs.50,000 balance with six-percent interest, before execution of the sale deed.

Issues

  1. Whether the agreement was a sale agreement or security for a loan.
  2. Whether specific performance should stand and what further payment was required to do complete justice.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal dismissed without costs, subject to the additional-payment direction. The purchasers must pay Rs.3,50,000 extra plus the Rs.50,000 balance carrying six-percent interest from 11 February 2004 to actual payment, upon which the sale deed must be executed.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2022] 1 S.C.R. 798.