VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 25/09/2018

VILASINI versus STATE OF KERALA

[2018] 14 S.C.R. 1

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court partly allowed a sentence-only appeal concerning possession of three litres of arrack. The applicable Abkari provision required both imprisonment and a fine of at least ₹1 lakh, so the fine could not be reduced. Considering the appellant’s poverty, age, absence of criminal antecedents, the small quantity, the twelve-year-old case and approximately two-and-a-half months already served, the Court reduced substantive imprisonment to time undergone. It reduced default imprisonment to one week if the mandatory fine was not paid within one month.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicable statutory fine could be reduced below ₹1 lakh.
  2. Whether the circumstances warranted reduction of substantive and default imprisonment.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal partly allowed: substantive imprisonment reduced to time undergone; ₹1 lakh fine retained, payable within one month, with one week’s imprisonment in default.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2018] 14 S.C.R. 1.