VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 28/02/2019

ABDUL HAKEEM M.A. & ORS. versus MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY & ORS.

[2019] 3 S.C.R. 382 · 2019 INSC 293

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Court held that the appellant engineering teachers had been regularly appointed to substantive University posts and were entitled to the restored pay-revision relief. The appointment documents and the University’s own treatment of them contradicted its later claim that they were temporary faculty of a separate self-financing institution. A distinct petitioner with an express temporary appointment was segregated.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellants were substantive permanent teachers or temporary staff of a separate self-financing institution.
  2. Whether pay-revision benefits could be restricted on the asserted temporary status.

Held

Result

Appeals allowed; Division Bench judgments set aside and Single Judge’s order of 8 January 2014 declaring permanent status and directing pay-revision benefits restored. No costs. Jacob K Daniel’s special leave petitions segregated for listing before the appropriate Court.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 3 S.C.R. 382.