VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 11/05/2020

THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND MUSEUMS, JAIPUR & ANR. versus ASHISH GAUTAM & ORS.

[2020] 4 S.C.R. 173 · 2020 INSC 394

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The blanket prohibition on functions at Sisodia Rani ka Bagh was modified to permit appropriate activities only between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Laser lights, loud music and fireworks remained completely prohibited. The monument’s enclosed setting and historical and tourism significance supported regulated use alongside strict conservation conditions. Maintenance, staffing and consultant-led beautification were directed, with further reports due in one month and monitoring retained.

Issues

  1. Whether all functions at the monument required prohibition or regulated use could be permitted.
  2. What environmental and maintenance conditions should govern permitted activities.

Held

Result

Appeal partly allowed; Tribunal’s blanket ban modified subject to specified time, environmental and maintenance restrictions. Consultant and development reports directed within one month, with listing and monitoring to continue.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2020] 4 S.C.R. 173.