VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 07/10/2021

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI versus MOHAMMED MEERAN SHAHUL HAMEED

[2021] 8 S.C.R. 758 · 2021 INSC 630

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Court held that limitation under Section 263(2) of the Income Tax Act turns on when the Commissioner makes the revisional order, rather than when the assessee receives it. The provision bars making an order after two years from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be revised was passed. As the revisional order was made within the applicable period, later receipt did not render it time-barred. The revenue’s appeal was allowed on that question of law.

Issues

  1. Whether receipt by the assessee, rather than making of the revisional order, determines compliance with Section 263(2).
  2. Whether the revisional order was barred merely because the assessee received it after the asserted deadline.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Revenue’s appeal allowed; question of law answered in its favour and the Commissioner’s revisional order held within Section 263(2) limitation. No costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2021] 8 S.C.R. 758.