VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 14/03/2022

HIGH COURT OF DELHI versus DEVINA SHARMA

[2022] 2 S.C.R. 513 · 2022 INSC 304

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Delhi High Court challenged interim orders postponing judicial recruitment examinations over age eligibility. The Supreme Court upheld the minimum age of thirty-five for direct recruitment to the Delhi Higher Judicial Service. As a one-time measure following missed recruitment years, it permitted candidates who met the respective upper age limits in 2020 or 2021 to take the 2022 examinations. It fixed revised application and examination dates and disposed of the transferred writ petitions.

Issues

  1. Whether Article 233 precluded prescribing a minimum age of thirty-five for direct recruitment as a District Judge.
  2. Whether candidates who became overage after missed recruitment years should receive one-time eligibility relief.
  3. How the recruitment examinations should proceed.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeals partly allowed. The minimum age of thirty-five for the Delhi Higher Judicial Service was upheld; specified one-time upper-age relief and revised 2022 recruitment dates were directed. The transferred writ petitions and pending applications were disposed of.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2022] 2 S.C.R. 513.