VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 23/09/2022

HARPAL SINGH AND ANR. ETC. ETC. versus STATE OF PUNJAB ETC. ETC.

[2022] 4 S.C.R. 874 · 2022 INSC 1018

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

Landowners whose land in Punjab was acquired under notifications of 2000 and 2002 appealed against the compensation fixed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. That compensation was Rs. 19,85,700 an acre, following Surjit Singh, and Rs. 7,80,000 an acre in one appeal, following Kapoor Singh. This Court had since enhanced compensation in Surjit Singh by Rs. 2 lakh an acre and in Kapoor Singh by Rs. 1 lakh an acre, payable by the Greater Mohali Area Development Authority. Because the appellants were similarly placed, the Court enhanced their compensation in the same terms, with statutory solatium on the enhanced amount. Given the substantial delay in filing the appeals, it denied interest and other statutory benefits for the period between the High Court's judgments and the filing of the appeals in this Court.

Issues

  1. Whether landowners similarly placed to those in Surjit Singh and Kapoor Singh were entitled to the same enhancement of compensation granted by this Court in those cases.
  2. Whether delay in filing the appeals justified denying statutory benefits for the period of delay.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeals partly allowed. Compensation was enhanced by Rs. 1 lakh an acre in the appeal arising from RFA No. 1614 of 2000 and by Rs. 2 lakh an acre in the rest, with statutory solatium. Interest and statutory benefits were denied for the period of delay. The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority was to deposit the amounts within three months. No costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2022] 4 S.C.R. 874.