VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 18/12/2019

G H P. SINGARAVELAN & ORS. ETC. ETC versus THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPPUR AND DT & ORS. ETC. ETC.

[2019] 15 S.C.R. 408 · 2019 INSC 1400

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

Tamil Nadu drivers were entitled under the 1998 pay revision to Selection Grade Rs.4000–6000 and Special Grade Rs.4300–6000, rather than the higher brackets granted in some earlier cases. Non-speaking refusals of special leave did not establish a binding interpretation, and Article 14 did not require repetition of erroneous benefits. The same schedule entry governed the connected High Court drivers’ claims.

Issues

  1. Which revised Selection and Special Grade scales applied to drivers.
  2. What effect followed from prior non-speaking SLP dismissals and grants to similarly placed drivers.
  3. Whether the High Court should have referred disagreement with a coordinate Bench.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Drivers’ appeals dismissed and the impugned judgment confirmed. Connected State appeals partly allowed: High Court drivers’ pay benefits must be fixed under serial 6 of Schedule II, with Selection Grade Rs.4000–6000 and Special Grade Rs.4300–6000.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 15 S.C.R. 408.