VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 02/08/2019

UNION OF INDIA versus YASMEEN MOHAMMAD ZAHID @ YASMEEN

[2019] 10 S.C.R. 996 · 2019 INSC 856

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

Convictions for criminal conspiracy and intentional association with a terrorist organisation were affirmed, and the trial court’s sentences of three and seven years were restored. Attendance at ideological classes, possession of related material and the attempted journey to Afghanistan established the requisite intent on the proved facts. Acquittals for waging war, support and fundraising offences remained because their distinct ingredients were unproved. The Court rejected the view that liability under section 38 makes section 39 superfluous.

Issues

  1. Whether the proved conduct established the intent required for the conspiracy and association convictions.
  2. Whether separate support, fundraising and waging-war charges were established.
  3. Whether sympathy justified reduction of the trial sentences.

Held

Result

Accused’s appeal dismissed. Union’s challenge to acquittals under section 125 IPC and sections 39–40 UAPA dismissed, but its sentencing challenge allowed. Trial sentences of three years for section 120B IPC and seven years for section 38 UAPA restored; existing fine and default terms unaffected.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2019] 10 S.C.R. 996.