VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 30/01/2020

OM PRAKASH versus SURESH KUMAR

[2020] 1 S.C.R. 565 · 2020 INSC 111

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court held the landlord to counsel’s unequivocal commitment to re-induct a tenant after reconstruction, considering the particular litigation history and indulgence obtained on that basis. It modified the arrangement to give the tenant the full front portion of the ground floor and ₹74,000 for reduced area, replacing the daily-delay damages arrangement. A court receiver was appointed to supervise compliance and rent was left for determination by the Rent Controller.

Issues

  1. Whether the landlord could withdraw from counsel’s commitment to re-induct the tenant after reconstruction.
  2. What arrangement would implement that commitment given the building’s staircase and reduced usable area.

Held

Result

Appeals partly allowed and the High Court decree modified with directions for re-induction, ₹74,000 compensation, receiver supervision and rent determination. No order as to costs; pending applications disposed of.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2020] 1 S.C.R. 565.