VidhiSangh

Supreme Court of India · 22/07/2021

M/S LAUREATE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. versus CHARANJEET SINGH

[2021] 6 S.C.R. 673 · 2021 INSC 347

AI-generated headnote. Verify against the judgment before relying on it. Paragraph numbers refer to the judgment.

Summary

A subsequent purchaser of a delayed flat is not categorically barred from interest on a refund. The Court rejected the contrary per se rule in Raje Ram, as applied in Arifur Rahman Khan, and held that relief depends on the facts and relative equities. Here, the builder had acknowledged the transfer but still failed to deliver possession. The refund award was modified to carry interest at 9% per annum from April 2016, when the builder learnt of the transfer, rather than 10% from the original deposits.

Issues

  1. Whether a subsequent purchaser who steps into an original allottee’s position can receive interest on a refund for prolonged non-delivery, and from what date.

Provisions considered

Held

Result

Appeal partly allowed; refund interest modified to 9% per annum from April 2016. No order as to costs.

Judgment PDF: Supreme Court of India, [2021] 6 S.C.R. 673.